Ticket #11 (task)
Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
Pick low level QAQC flagging scheme
Status: closed (fixed)
| Reported by: | cbc | Assigned to: | haines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 2006 SECOORA documentation contract |
| Component: | qaqc | Version: | 3.0 |
| Keywords: | CDL | Cc: | |
pick low-flagging scheme (see QC Notes, Dec 2005)
Change History
07/12/06 14:45:49: Modified by cbc
- status changed from new to closed.
- resolution set to fixed.
07/12/06 16:39:16: Modified by cbc
- cc deleted.
We sovled this in ticket #10 based on this snippet from Jeremy's QC notes (link in above history):
#Most descriptive and least compacted 1) Define separate 'shadow' qc variables for each observation_type(sst for example) with one 'shadow' variable for each type of low level test (currently 4 qc variables to every variable populated 1 or 0 for each data point.).
salinity = 36.3266,36.3288,36.3292, ... salinity_qcflag_high_level = 3, 3, 0, ... salinity_qcflag_equipment_range = 1, 1, 0, ... salinity_qcflag_local_range = 1, 1, 0, ... salinity_qcflag_lack_of_data = 1, 1, 0, ... salinity_qcflag_time_discrepancy = 1, 1, 0, ...